Pentec, Inc.

About Pentec

Services

Research and Publications

Pentec in the News

Contact Us


Research & Publications

Holmes, Sarah E. “A Neuropsychological Investigation into the Validity of Handwriting Analysis,” Boston University Department of Psychology. pdf icon

Abstract
This study is an investigation into the validity of handwriting analysis. Proponents of graphology maintain that personality traits are manifested in fine motor expression (i.e., handwriting) and this study seeks to explore the relationship between personality, cognitive functioning and handwriting. Currently, the research on handwriting as a tool for personality assessment offers mixed results, some studies support the notion that it is a valid and reliable measure of character while others claim that it lacks scientific merit and that the accuracy of the graphological evaluations is no better than chance. Despite differing opinions in the scientific community, handwriting examiners advise individual, legal and corporate clients across the country. Individuals retain their services for self-knowledge, relationship and vocational guidance, attorneys hire them as Jury & Trial Consultants, and human resource departments hire them to assist in the selection of personnel.

 

Holmes, Ruth E. and Sarah Holmes. “Attorney Trial Advantage: Jury Consultants Using Handwriting in and out of the Courtroom,” as appeared in Ohio Trial magazine (Spring 1999).

The most common use of handwriting examiners in the legal system is authenticating signatures and determining the identity of writers in cases of forgeries, fraud, embezzlement and anonymous letters.

 

Holmes, Ruth E. “Graphological Typology for Visionaries,” Journal of the American Society of Professional Graphologists (1995/1996). pdf icon

Abstract
The handwriting of approximately 100 visionary leaders in such fields as business, science, education, art, politics and film was analyzed and categorized. Four distinct types of creativity emerged:

(1) Conforming-Creative
(2) Compensated-Conflicted
(3) Productive-Versatile, and
(4) Empowered

Common traits and distinct differences among all these individuals were assessed.